Re: IFQ_ENQUEUE argument refactor (was Re: RFC: ALTQ caller refactor)

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 09:05:07AM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> I would suggest that the only "proper" use of mbuf tags as currently
> implemented is experimentation.  Uses of the tags which have been in
> the tree for a decade or more should be subsumed into the mbuf
> datastructure itself, with some care taken to not make it too large,
> or perhaps a single, "standard" extension structure could be defined
> to capture the less-common cases.

That's essentially what I said much earlier, except with packet header
instead of just mbuf.

Joerg