Re: How to identify specific wait-state for a "DE" process?

To: tech-kern%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: How to identify specific wait-state for a "DE" process?
From: David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 20:17:27 +0000

On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 08:10:36AM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
 > Does anyone have any good suggestions for how to arrange for another
 > thread/lwp to run so it can remove the extra reference to the logging
 > descriptor?

A better suggestion: remove the broken behavior of close().

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost

Follow-Ups:
- Re: How to identify specific wait-state for a "DE" process?
  - From: Paul Goyette

References:
- How to identify specific wait-state for a "DE" process?
  - From: Paul Goyette
- Re: How to identify specific wait-state for a "DE" process?
  - From: Michael van Elst
- Re: How to identify specific wait-state for a "DE" process?
  - From: Paul Goyette
- Re: How to identify specific wait-state for a "DE" process?
  - From: Michael van Elst
- Re: How to identify specific wait-state for a "DE" process?
  - From: Paul Goyette
- Re: How to identify specific wait-state for a "DE" process?
  - From: Paul Goyette

Prev by Date: Re: How to identify specific wait-state for a "DE" process?
Next by Date: Re: How to identify specific wait-state for a "DE" process?
Previous by Thread: Re: How to identify specific wait-state for a "DE" process?
Next by Thread: Re: How to identify specific wait-state for a "DE" process?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index