Re: Preproc condition for GCC 2.x

[Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 18.09.2015 00:53, Michael McConville wrote:
> Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:15:34PM -0400, Michael McConville
>> wrote:
>>> I suspect that this preproc condition isn't necessary anymore?
>>> It's in sys/sys/device.h:246.
>> 
>> We require C99 support for the kernel, so no, just use FMA.
> 
> Would the devs be interested in a bulk patch to remove these
> conditions?
> 

It's reasonable.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=MAIr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----