tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Enormous scheduler bug

To: Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <rmind%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: Enormous scheduler bug
From: Maxime Villard <max%m00nbsd.net@localhost>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 10:07:32 +0200

Also, kern/kern_idle.c::create_idle_lwp():

	lwp_lock(l);
	l->l_flag |= LW_IDLE;
	lwp_unlock(l);
	l->l_cpu = ci;

shouldn't l_cpu be set when lwp is locked?

References:
- Enormous scheduler bug
  - From: Maxime Villard
- Re: Enormous scheduler bug
  - From: Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
- Re: Enormous scheduler bug
  - From: Maxime Villard

Prev by Date: 2*(void *) atomic swap?
Next by Date: Re: 2*(void *) atomic swap?
Previous by Thread: Re: Enormous scheduler bug
Next by Thread: 2*(void *) atomic swap?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index