Re: x96 cannot build without MULTIPROCESSOR

[Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost>]

On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 06:57:26PM +0200, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> wrote:
> 
> > > Then it should not be an option.
> > It is a real option on some other architecturs, so this gets tricky.
> 
> At least it should be documented as such: options(4) can note it is
> implicit x86 and whatever other architectures.
> 
> Then MULTIPROCESSOR can be set by a #define on x86, and config(1) can be
> modified to reject the option as deprecated on x86.

I don't think it's worth hacking up config to do that.

Thor