David Holland writes:
I think keeping evb* for boards makes sense, though.
i dunno.
i don't see what it adds. in particular, "evb" means evaluation
board, and there are heaps of things in evb* that are *not*
evaluation boards, but stuff that might have once been once.
i wish we'd just collapse as much as possible back to plain old
MACHINE=MACHINE_ARCH=whatever. i just don't see any value or
validity in "evb". is ERLITE an evaluation board? what about
the RPI or CUBIE* systems? they come pretty complete AFAICT,
designed as end-user systems, not what we used to consider as
being "evalation boards".