re: (patch) Improved documentation and examples of dynamic modules

[matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost>]

> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 01:52:05PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> > A FreeBSD developer studying our examples told me that we traditionally use
> > u_int in place of unsigned [int] - calling the usage of 'unsigned' a linuxism.
> > I have no opinions on it. How is it?
> 
> Personally, I consider the use of u_int a historic mistake, but it is
> wildly used. Why the use of plain standard C is a Linuxism is beyond me.

i've been using "unsigned" as is for a while now, when i need it.
i had never ever considrered it could be a linuxism.


.mrg.