[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: struct ifnet and ifaddr handling [was: Re: Making global variables of if.c MPSAFE]
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Masao Uebayashi <uebayasi%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Ryota Ozaki <ozaki-r%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Masao Uebayashi <uebayasi%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
>>> I overlooked you've back out the struct callout * dynamic allocation
>>> part. Can you make it use kmem as I showed?
>> Hmm, I'll do so, although I don't yet understand why the pointer version
>> is better than the embedded version.
> You told that the pseudo interfaces have no watchdog/slowtimo.
> Routers might have thousands of pseudo interfaces. I'd save 10
> pointers there. struct ifnet is already too big.
Sure. I'm persuaded :)
> But it's also true that callout_t is designed to be opaque to be
> embedded in other structs.
Main Index |
Thread Index |