[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: MI linker script
On Nov 9, 10:35am, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
} On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 5:07 AM, John Nemeth <jnemeth%cue.bc.ca@localhost> wrote:
} > On Nov 9, 1:25am, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
} > } On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Christos Zoulas <christos%astron.com@localhost> wrote:
} > } > depending on ld -r to work properly
} > }
} > } I know none of you trust me, but you don't trust ld -r?
} > It has nothing to do with trust. It's more like wanting to
} > know what the heck is going on. Normally major work like this
} > would start with a discussion or at least an announcement of the
} > plan. Instead all that happened is suddenly we see a major overhaul
} > of a critical item with no clue as to why.
} > So, what is the plan? Why are you doing this? What are your
} > goals (i.e. what is the expected end result)? What are you doing
} > with modules?
} Something like this:
} In short: making kernel build better by sharing *.o
The question wasn't simply about "ld -r" stuff. It was about
the entire program of config(1) changes, linking changes, module(9)
changes, etc. There's an awful lot of stuff happening to major
parts of the system without any discussion.
}-- End of excerpt from Masao Uebayashi
Main Index |
Thread Index |