tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: ixg(4) performances

To: tls%panix.com@localhost (Thor Lancelot Simon)
Subject: Re: ixg(4) performances
From: manu%netbsd.org@localhost (Emmanuel Dreyfus)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 06:54:10 +0200

Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost> wrote:

> MTU 9000 considered harmful.  Use something that fits in 8K with the headers.
> It's a minor piece of the puzzle but nonetheless, it's a piece.

mtu 8192 or 8000 does not cause any improvement over mtu 9000.

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu%netbsd.org@localhost

References:
- Re: ixg(4) performances
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon

Prev by Date: Re: ixg(4) performances
Next by Date: Re: RFC: IRQ affinity (aka interrupt routing)
Previous by Thread: Re: ixg(4) performances
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index