Re: RFC: IRQ affinity (aka interrupt routing)

[Kengo NAKAHARA <k-nakahara%iij.ad.jp@localhost>]

Hi,

(2014/08/21 23:36), Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 07:35:21PM +0900, Kengo NAKAHARA wrote:
> > Currently intrctl use "14" for both 'ioapic0' and 'ioapic1', this is
> > a bug...
> > I fix it as intrctl use "14" for 'ioapic0' on the other hand "38" for
> > 'ioapic1'. "38" for 'ioapic1' is defined following
>
> I think this is extremely counterintuitive.  I think strings should be
> used in this interface.

I reconsider this matter, I also think intrctl should use strings.
Please see
    http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2014/08/22/msg017535.html

Could you comment this specification?

Thanks,

--
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Internet Initiative Japan Inc.

Device Engineering Section,
Core Product Development Department,
Product Division,
Technology Unit

Kengo NAKAHARA <k-nakahara%iij.ad.jp@localhost>