Re: serious performance regression in .41

[David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:56:31AM +0200, J. Hannken-Illjes wrote:
 > > Note that the ffs code did not take the
 > > interlock before (so before the iterator changes it was unsafe). The
 > > machine performance is now back where it was. Without the patch
 > > the performance regression was so bad, that the machine was unusable
 > > even for simple editing (there were freezes each time the syncer
 > > ran). Is it ok if I commit it,
 > 
 > No, it is wrong in some parts.

...where?

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost