Re: uvm objects with physical address constraints

[Matt Thomas <matt%3am-software.com@localhost>]

On May 20, 2014, at 4:20 PM, Taylor R Campbell <riastradh%NetBSD.org@localhost> 
wrote:

>   Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 13:54:44 -0700
>   From: Matt Thomas <matt%3am-software.com@localhost>
> 
>   Wrong approach.  These should be on dedicated vm freelists instead.
>   Look at how mips64 has first512m, first4g, etc.  You could have 
>   first4g, first64g, first1t.  Then you can use UVM_PGA_STRAT_ONLY.
> 
> How about the attached patch to add uao_set_pgfl(uao, freelist)
> instead?
> <uao_freelist.patch>

Looks reasonable.