Re: Vnode API cleanup pass 2a

To: J. Hannken-Illjes <hannken%eis.cs.tu-bs.de@localhost>, David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>, "tech-kern%netbsd.org@localhost list" <tech-kern%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: Vnode API cleanup pass 2a
From: Taylor R Campbell <campbell+netbsd-tech-kern%mumble.net@localhost>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:31:56 +0000

   Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 16:08:04 +0000
   From: Taylor R Campbell <campbell+netbsd-tech-kern%mumble.net@localhost>

   As is, existing code calling, e.g., VOP_MKDIR will still compile.  Is
   there a reason the versioning doesn't rename it to VOP_MKDIR_V2?

For that matter, why new machinery for this versioning stuff at all?
Why not just rename the vop from mkdir to mkdir_v2?  That would take
care of both struct vop_mkdir_v2_args and VOP_MKDIR_V2.  Am I missing
something?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Vnode API cleanup pass 2a
  - From: David Holland
- Re: Vnode API cleanup pass 2a
  - From: Alan Barrett

References:
- Re: Vnode API cleanup pass 2a
  - From: Taylor R Campbell

Prev by Date: Re: Vnode API cleanup pass 2a
Next by Date: Re: Vnode API cleanup pass 2a
Previous by Thread: Re: Vnode API cleanup pass 2a
Next by Thread: Re: Vnode API cleanup pass 2a
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index