Re: storage-class memory (was: Re: state of XIP?)

[Matt Thomas <matt%3am-software.com@localhost>]

On Oct 18, 2013, at 1:06 AM, David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost> 
wrote:

>> The only problem is marking data as copy-on-write
>> but again these pages aren't managed so the current COW code won't
>> be happy.
> 
> We shouldn't have to care about that unless we want to move to
> MAP_COPY from MAP_PRIVATE.

Huh?  I'm was talking about an executable's .data section.
Since we are talking about execute-in-place.