Re: high load, no bottleneck

[manu%netbsd.org@localhost (Emmanuel Dreyfus)]

David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:

> The downside is that without the cache flushing there's some chance
> that fsck won't be able to repair things afterwards.

This is scary. If this is a WAPBL/NFS/RAIDframe interaction, I think I'd
rather dump the RAID than the insurence to have a working fsck after a
crash.

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu%netbsd.org@localhost