Re: high load, no bottleneck

[manu%netbsd.org@localhost (Emmanuel Dreyfus)]

Christos Zoulas <christos%zoulas.com@localhost> wrote:

> On large filesystems with many files fsck can take a really long time after
> a crash. In my personal experience power outages are much less frequent than
> crashes (I crash quite a lot since I always fiddle with things). If you
> don't care about fsck time, you don't need WAPBL. 

But you just told me that I will need a fsck after crash now I am
running with vfs.wapbl.flush_disk_cache=0 so I wonder if I should not
just mount without -o log. What are WAPBL benefits when running with
vfs.wapbl.flush_disk_cache=0?

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu%netbsd.org@localhost