Re: Max. number of subdirectories dump

[Manuel Wiesinger <manuel%bsdstammtisch.at@localhost>]

On 08/18/13 18:24, Mouse wrote:
> Your subdirectory names are comaratively short.
I've been testing the special case, where only directories are in a
directory, they are short for that reason, to get a real maximum of 
subdirectories.

> > [W]hy does dump iterate the indirect blocks, when looking for
> > subdirectories?
>
> Because it may need to.
Thanks for the detailed clarification!
It was already clear :)

I'm testing right now, to access indirect blocks from triple directories.