[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: kcpuset(9) questions
Matt Thomas <matt%3am-software.com@localhost> wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2013, at 3:33 PM, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
> > Any reason why do you need bitfield based iteration, as opposed to list
> > or array based?
> Be nice to have a MI method instead a hodgepodge of MD methods.
> The CPU_FOREACH method is ugly.
I totally agree. That is why couple years ago I wanted to add and convert
everything to MI replacement of struct cpu_info. Since this work requires
intervention to all ports, it did not materialise since.. After cleaning
up the dust from ancient patches, I could put MI interface into a branch.
However, I do not think that adding ad-hoc bitfield based interface in
addition to the "ugly" one is an improvement. Quite the opposite as then
we would need to deal with two "not great" ones.
Main Index |
Thread Index |