tech-kern archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: core statement on fexecve, O_EXEC, and O_SEARCH
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 08:39:55AM -0500, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> I also think we need to check, for all the fch*, fexec* syscalls:
>
> * permissions both retained from the file's open and at the time
> of use
I don't think this is necessary, any more than it is for read and
write permissions.
> * whether the name in question still refers to the file in question
I don't see the point of this.
> * whether the name in question is within the process' current root
> (forbidding fchdir and fchroot otherwise).
Definitely.
--
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost
- References:
- Re: core statement on fexecve, O_EXEC, and O_SEARCH
- core statement on fexecve, O_EXEC, and O_SEARCH
- Re: core statement on fexecve, O_EXEC, and O_SEARCH
- Re: core statement on fexecve, O_EXEC, and O_SEARCH
- Re: core statement on fexecve, O_EXEC, and O_SEARCH
- Re: core statement on fexecve, O_EXEC, and O_SEARCH
- From: Thor Lancelot Simon
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index