Re: core statement on fexecve, O_EXEC, and O_SEARCH

[Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost>]

On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 05:17:25PM +0300, Aleksey Cheusov wrote:
> 
> On the other hand if we generalize improvements of fchdir(2) and fchroot(2)
> (I mean EPERM if  the current working directory is not at or under the new
> root directory), that is reimplement them with a help of kauth(9) we
> will be able to do the same for fexecve(2).

I don't think that's necessarily the case (we've discussed why earlier
in this terribly fragmented thread).

Thor