[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: fexecve, round 2
Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost> wrote:
> This appears to contradict either the description of O_EXEC in the
> standard, or the standard's rationale for adding fexecve(). The
> standard says O_EXEC causes the file to be open for execution "only".
The definition is really vague. As I understand, nothing forbids opening
O_EXEC|O_RDWR. I understood O_EXEC as "I explicitely say I will execute
this fd will fexecve, so let me open even if I cannot read"
How do you understand it?
Main Index |
Thread Index |