On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 08:34:29 +0000 David Laight <david%l8s.co.uk@localhost> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:14:18PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > > > Frankly, I still don't see the point why something would want to > > use it. > > How about running a staticly linked executable inside a chroot without > needed the executable itself to do the chroot. What does this gain over passing a filename around? (NB. I'm not claiming that's an entirely safe model either, but it's already possible). Julian -- 3072D/F3A66B3A Julian Yon (2012 General Use) <pgp.2012%jry.me@localhost>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature