Re: WAPL panic

[David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 11:34:08AM +0100, Edgar Fu? wrote:
 > > wapbl_register_inode shouldn't be able to reach that panic...
 > Maybe that's some stack frame optimization.

Well... as far as I can tell wapbl_register_inode does not call
wapbl_register_deallocation, so it shouldn't be. But maybe ddb is
lying; wouldn't be the first time.

 > > it's in wapbl_register_deallocation.
 > Yes, as it says: wapbl_register_deallocation: out of resources
 > 
 > > ffs_truncate calls both, but mkdir shouldn't result in things being
 > > released... or so I'd think.
 >
 > But the panics occured during a bunch of mkdirs and ddb says the
 > active process is mkdir!

Right, I'm not saying it didn't happen, it just doesn't make sense.

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost