[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: WAPL panic
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 11:34:08AM +0100, Edgar Fu? wrote:
> > wapbl_register_inode shouldn't be able to reach that panic...
> Maybe that's some stack frame optimization.
Well... as far as I can tell wapbl_register_inode does not call
wapbl_register_deallocation, so it shouldn't be. But maybe ddb is
lying; wouldn't be the first time.
> > it's in wapbl_register_deallocation.
> Yes, as it says: wapbl_register_deallocation: out of resources
> > ffs_truncate calls both, but mkdir shouldn't result in things being
> > released... or so I'd think.
> But the panics occured during a bunch of mkdirs and ddb says the
> active process is mkdir!
Right, I'm not saying it didn't happen, it just doesn't make sense.
David A. Holland
Main Index |
Thread Index |