Re: fixing zfs

[christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

In article <20121014193635.6CCF3604A8%jupiter.mumble.net@localhost>,
Taylor R Campbell  <campbell+netbsd-tech-kern%mumble.net@localhost> wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>The attached patches fixes a lot of issues in our zfs port mainly
>having to do with locking and our (insane) vop protocols.  With it,
>many of the zfs tests pass much more reliably, although there remain a
>number that still fail, mainly having to do with permissions and file
>flags.
>
>Currently zfs is badly hosed, and I am pretty confident that at least
>the intent of these patches is correct even if I have made some
>mistakes in the details.  So I strongly doubt whether committing these
>patches would make our zfs situation any worse than it currently is.
>
>Any objections?  If not, I'll commit them tomorrow or in the next few
>days.

None from here.

christos