[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: fixing zfs
In article <20121014193635.6CCF3604A8%jupiter.mumble.net@localhost>,
Taylor R Campbell <campbell+netbsd-tech-kern%mumble.net@localhost> wrote:
>The attached patches fixes a lot of issues in our zfs port mainly
>having to do with locking and our (insane) vop protocols. With it,
>many of the zfs tests pass much more reliably, although there remain a
>number that still fail, mainly having to do with permissions and file
>Currently zfs is badly hosed, and I am pretty confident that at least
>the intent of these patches is correct even if I have made some
>mistakes in the details. So I strongly doubt whether committing these
>patches would make our zfs situation any worse than it currently is.
>Any objections? If not, I'll commit them tomorrow or in the next few
None from here.
Main Index |
Thread Index |