[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: [RFC][PATCH] _UC_TLSBASE for all ports
On Aug 11, 1:35pm, tls%panix.com@localhost (Thor Lancelot Simon) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] _UC_TLSBASE for all ports
| On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 06:45:12AM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| > It is a slippery slope, but I think in this case it is wise to bend.
| > If we cannot reach agreement here, consult core.
| I see no point bending NetBSD into knots in this case if the resulting
| performance is as bad as Joerg claims it will be. Is it actually the
| case that our *context() functions are almost as heavy as a full
| kernel-level thread switch?
The point is that glusterfs works without code modifications (or minimal ones)
and wit acceptable performance.
Main Index |
Thread Index |