Re: [RFC][PATCH] _UC_TLSBASE for all ports

[David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 08:56:42PM +0200, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
 > > Only by addressing the complete picture can we reasonably expect to
 > > decide on a semantically sound interface that we won't regret in the
 > > future.
 > 
 > Short reply, I will address the rest later:
 > 
 > We already have the  _UC_TLSBASE feature for most of our ports. I just
 > propose to complete the missing ones. This is not about deciding of a
 > new interface.

Yes yes, you're talking about a tree, I'm asking about this large
forest thing.

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost