Re: Raidframe and disk strategy

[Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost>]

On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:07:24PM -0700, Brian Buhrow wrote:
>
> Presumably, the underlying disks can use what ever strategy they use for
> handling queued data, but I'm wondering if there is a particular reason the
> fcfs strategy was chosen for the raidframe driver as opposed to letting the
> system administrator pick the strategy?  My particular environment has a

RAIDframe implements its own disk sorting algorithm (several, actually)
internally.  Why sort twice?

Thor