Re: lwp resource limit

[Matt Thomas <matt%3am-software.com@localhost>]

On Jun 12, 2012, at 8:26 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:

> On Jun 13,  2:15am, yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: lwp resource limit
> 
> | > Can you explain what you mean by api incompatible? It is used in 
> getrlimit the
> | > same way we use it, how can it be different?
> | 
> | it's semantics (what's counted for) is different, isn't it?
> 
> I don't know, the pages I looked don't offer details.

The nice thing about our semantics is you can disable threaded programs
by setting lwp count to 0 but still allow non-threaded programs to run.