Re: lwp resource limit

[Matt Thomas <matt%3am-software.com@localhost>]

On Jun 8, 2012, at 9:19 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote:

> On Jun 8,  9:00am, matt%3am-software.com@localhost (Matt Thomas) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: lwp resource limit
> 
> | 
> | On Jun 8, 2012, at 5:24 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> | 
> | >> +        if (l->l_flag & LW_RESCOUNT)
> | >> 
> | >> I don't see the need for this, why not check p_nlwp == 1?
> | >> 
> | >> if this is the first lwp for the proc p_nlwp should be 0 so check
> | >> maxproc otherwise maxlwp.
> | > 
> | > You are forgetting compat_linux.
> | 
> | No I'm not.  I'm not using l_lid but the # of lwps in the proc.
> 
> I made the change, but now this begs the question to remove the enforce
> argument because I don't like the assymmetry. Should I do that too? And
> ignore kthreads in using a different criterion?

LW_SYSTEM/LW_INTR threads shouldn't be counted