tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: ENOATTR vs ENODATA

To: martin%duskware.de@localhost (Martin Husemann), jeanyves.migeon%free.fr@localhost (Jean-Yves Migeon)
Subject: Re: ENOATTR vs ENODATA
From: manu%netbsd.org@localhost (Emmanuel Dreyfus)
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:39:40 +0200

Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> wrote:

> It is better to fix with a patch in pkgsrc, IMHO.

Consider that Linux returns ENODATA, therefore most programs will check
that. The only programs we may encouter that will check for ENOATTR will
be from FreeBSD (are there any?) or MacOS X.

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu%netbsd.org@localhost

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ENOATTR vs ENODATA
  - From: Martin Husemann

References:
- Re: ENOATTR vs ENODATA
  - From: Martin Husemann

Prev by Date: Re: ENOATTR vs ENODATA
Next by Date: Re: ENOATTR vs ENODATA
Previous by Thread: Re: ENOATTR vs ENODATA
Next by Thread: Re: ENOATTR vs ENODATA
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index