[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: ENOATTR vs ENODATA
> There is a choice to be made about returing ENOATTR or ENODATA [...]
> In order to get the broader compatibility, I suggest patching our
> errno.h to define ENOATTR as ENODATA. Opinions?
As a code author, I don't like this.
A similar situation already exists with EAGAIN and EWOULDBLOCK: some
systems define only one, some only the other, some both with different
values, and some both with the same value (often one in terms of the
The last of these is rather annoying, because it means that a simple
produces a compile-time error. So, my opinion would be to prefer one
of the other alternatives.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Main Index |
Thread Index |