Re: PUFFS and existing file that get ENOENT

[Matthew Mondor <mm_lists%pulsar-zone.net@localhost>]

On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:26:30 +0000 (UTC)
yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:

> hi,
> 
> > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:56:33 +0000 (UTC)
> > yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> > 
> >> when the kernel wants to cache other files.
> >> ie. whenever the kernel decides to reclaim it. :-)
> >> you can increase the chance by running
> >>    while :;do sysctl -w kern.maxvnodes=0; done
> >> or something like that.
> > 
> > Wouldn't the performance also drop significantly with a permanently low
> > maxvnodes, though?
> 
> it does never succeed.
> anyway the performance is not a priority when trying to reproduce a bug.

Oh, I had missed the context, thanks for the explanation.
-- 
Matt