Re: Equivalent of FreeBSD kernel semaphore?

[manu%netbsd.org@localhost (Emmanuel Dreyfus)]

Christos Zoulas <christos%astron.com@localhost> wrote:

> Why don't you implement them the same way like FreeBSD did, using a mutex
> and a condition variable? 

I am not sure I correctly understand what you mean: is it that we do not
have an equivalent of NetBSD's struct sema, and that it would need to be
implemented using mutex and condvar?

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu%netbsd.org@localhost