Re: emap

[yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost (YAMAMOTO Takashi)]

hi,

> Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost> writes:
> 
>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:50:58PM +0400, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
>>> Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <rmind%netbsd.org@localhost> writes:
>>> 
>>> > yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
>>> >> hi,
>>> >> 
>>> >> what's the status of emap and pipe?
>>> >> 
>>> >
>>> > ... and encourage our users to use amd64 instead
>>> > of i386.
>>> 
>>> I'm sorry to intervene, what about WINE? Unless we're going to have it
>>> functional on amd64, encouraging is useless.
>>
>> I don't understand your comment.  Are you suggesting that a large fraction of
>> NetBSD/i386 users use WINE and therefore would not be able to switch to the
>> amd64 port?
> 
> I mean that those users who could switch most probably have switched already.
> And one of serious reasons to stay on i386 is functional WINE.

as we now have non-stack-based pthread_self (thanks joerg), porting
the recent versions of wine should not be too hard.  does it help wine
on amd64?

YAMAMOTO Takashi

> 
> 
> -- 
> HE CE3OH...