[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: sysctl(7) knob to allow users to control CPU affinity
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 01:50:49 +0100
Jean-Yves Migeon <jym%NetBSD.org@localhost> wrote:
> Here's a proposal for a sysctl(7) knob to easily allow non-superusers to
> set the CPU affinity of processes and threads they own:
> (ressembles the one already existing to allow for user mounts)
> Would it be acceptable to modify current secmodel_suser(9) to allow this?
> This issue comes regularly on various tech-* MLs, motivated by the fact
> that people expect this behavior based on what they encounter on other OS.
Just out of curiosity, but is it possible for the superuser to still
reserve wanted CPU/cores, such that non-privileged users could, if that
sysctl is enabled, work with the non-reserved ones? Or, can the
sysadmin specify CPU/cores and/or limits for non-privileged users?
Since the default is to not allow affinity control, it's not of utmost
importance, but it could allow a compromise between total restriction
and total freedom... I have no objection to that sysctl personally.
Main Index |
Thread Index |