Re: fs-independent quotas

[Ignatios Souvatzis <is%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 06:09:27PM +0000, David Holland wrote:
> support to other filesystems (tempfs, perhaps v7fs) or even add other
> filesystems that have or may have their own native quota handling
> (zfs, Hammer, you name it). 

zfs - does it really have quota? 

All the demos I've seen talk about sub-filesystem limits; you create
per-user sub-filesystems if you want to emulate per-user quota.

(Correct me if I'm wrong.)

How would this fit in, if at all?

        -is