On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 05:51:13PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote: > Why advertise uint16_t, are we trying to save memory? I would just do > them uint32_t... While few things are certain in computing, I don't think we are going to see a 65535 MHz processor any time soon. But sure, uint32_t is fine too. - Jukka.