tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: A simple cpufreq(9)

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 05:51:13PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Why advertise uint16_t, are we trying to save memory? I would just do
> them uint32_t...

While few things are certain in computing, I don't think we are going to
see a 65535 MHz processor any time soon. But sure, uint32_t is fine too.

- Jukka.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index