Re: strnlen(3) in kernel

[Jean-Yves Migeon <jeanyves.migeon%free.fr@localhost>]

On 06.09.2011 11:41, matthew green wrote:
>> Subject says it all. Anyone objects?
>>
>> Motivation behind:
>> - we already have strlen(3), so having strnlen(3) in kernel is somehow
>> natural.
>> - avoids things like [1] (there are probably other possible consumers in
>> kernel).
> 
> if it is in the kernel, it's strnlen(9)  :-)

Right !)

Is there a way to know what functions are available from libkern, and
those only found in userland libs? Except by looking at libkern.h?

-- 
Jean-Yves Migeon
jeanyves.migeon%free.fr@localhost