[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: strnlen(3) in kernel
In article <4E5EA673.8030009%free.fr@localhost>,
Jean-Yves Migeon <jeanyves.migeon%free.fr@localhost> wrote:
>Subject says it all. Anyone objects?
>- we already have strlen(3), so having strnlen(3) in kernel is somehow
>- avoids things like  (there are probably other possible consumers in
>Comments? If no-one objects, I'll commit this at the end of the week.
Looks fine to me. Don't forget to remove the duplicate copy from
Main Index |
Thread Index |