tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: strnlen(3) in kernel

In article <>,
Jean-Yves Migeon  <> wrote:
>Hi list,
>Subject says it all. Anyone objects?
>Motivation behind:
>- we already have strlen(3), so having strnlen(3) in kernel is somehow
>- avoids things like [1] (there are probably other possible consumers in
>Comments? If no-one objects, I'll commit this at the end of the week.

Looks fine to me. Don't forget to remove the duplicate copy from


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index