[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: netbsd32 emulation in driver open() or read()
On Aug 30, 3:18pm, bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost (Manuel Bouyer) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: netbsd32 emulation in driver open() or read()
| > Yes, look at PK_32 in the process flags. If you are going to do this, please
| > look at what FreeBSD did with bpf_ts/bpf_xhdr and the time format changes
| > and do the same (provide timespec/bintime etc). This is how they handle
| > compatibility mode too.
| This is related to the BIOCSTSTAMP ioctl isn't it ? I can see how it's used
| in kernel but I couldn't find it in userland. So, to me it looks like
| the old bpf_hdr is used most of the time ...
| I'm not sure if it's worth implementing BIOCSTSTAMP (and we have to assure
| compat for bpf_hdr anyway)
Might as well bite the bullet and do the whole thing because with 10Gb+
ethernet what we have now just does not cut it.
Main Index |
Thread Index |