Re: Addition to kauth(9) framework

[Rhialto <rhialto%falu.nl@localhost>]

On Mon 29 Aug 2011 at 13:32:50 +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:13:38PM +0200, Aleksey Cheusov wrote:
> > we will lost our data. Data set by first listerner will
> > be overriden by the second listerner.
> > This is not just waste of time.
> 
> Yes, but it is a design bug in the modules or in kauth and unrelated to
> the (un-)sharing, isn't it?

My expectation would be that if the first module unshares, the newly
unshared data is passed to the second module, who can unshare it again.
(I have not looked at code to check if that is what happens, or even if
it is easy to make it so)

-Olaf.
-- 
___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert  -- There's no point being grown-up if you 
\X/ rhialto/at/xs4all.nl    -- can't be childish sometimes. -The 4th Doctor