[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
On Aug 16, 2011, at 11:37 PM, David Brownlee wrote:
> On 16 August 2011 21:19, Lars Heidieker <lars%heidieker.de@localhost> wrote:
>> Real world benchmark is almost the same.
>> a release build eg
>> real user system
>> current: 2735 8422 1390
>> vmem-heap: 2716 8419 1383
>> variations between runs are easily larger then this.
> Would the benchmark be expected to show any difference in a high
> memory pressure situation?
I don't expect much of a difference except for the fact that there should be no
failed allocations with the changes, so performance wise probably a slight edge
for the vmem solution...
Main Index |
Thread Index |