[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: wrapping (some) ipis in arch/x86/
Cherry G. Mathew <cherry.g.mathew%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
>On 13 August 2011 11:26, Christos Zoulas <christos%astron.com@localhost> wrote:
>> In article <8762m4qlm8.fsf%zyx.in@localhost>, Cherry G. Mathew
>> <cherry%zyx.in@localhost> wrote:
>>>I'd like to ask peoples' opinions about the above patch. This would
>>>remove a couple of #ifdef XEN/#endif pairs I had to introduce
>> If those are performance critical, perhaps they should be inlined?
>I don't think they are - the first is a HALT ipi and the second
>"kicks" other sleeping CPUS via cpu_needs_resched()
So the first one isn't, but how often is the second one called?
Main Index |
Thread Index |