tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: rfc: vmem(9) API/implementation changes

To: Eduardo Horvath <eeh%NetBSD.org@localhost>, David Young <dyoung%pobox.com@localhost>, tech-kern%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: rfc: vmem(9) API/implementation changes
From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:27:05 +0200

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 06:10:17PM +0100, David Laight wrote:
> It is probably also worth avoiding allocating address 0 anyway.
> What is it address 0 of? The physical address seen on the bus??

Yes, physical bus address, or offset 0 in whatever the parent window
maps to (think pcmcia or similar) and is often a valid address.

Martin

References:
- rfc: vmem(9) API/implementation changes
  - From: David Young
- Re: rfc: vmem(9) API/implementation changes
  - From: Eduardo Horvath
- Re: rfc: vmem(9) API/implementation changes
  - From: David Laight

Prev by Date: Re: rfc: vmem(9) API/implementation changes
Next by Date: Re: rfc: vmem(9) API/implementation changes
Previous by Thread: Re: rfc: vmem(9) API/implementation changes
Next by Thread: Re: rfc: vmem(9) API/implementation changes
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index