Re: heads up: rename fixed

[Eric Haszlakiewicz <erh%nimenees.com@localhost>]

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 03:32:36AM +0000, David Holland wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:03:06PM +0200, Adam Hoka wrote:
>  > > > > Other fses with their own rename implementations whose locking is
>  > > > > clearly wrong include tmpfs, msdosfs, udf, and nilfs.
>  > > 
>  > > As opposed to ffs? What's your point?
>  > 
>  > I think he meant that it's most likely to be used in a production
>  > environment.
> 
> And ffs isn't? I still don't get the point.

Didn't you just say that ffs is already fixed?  If so, then it seems to me
like fixing tmpfs might be a better next step than fixing lfs (unless there's
something about lfs that makes it particular easy to fix).

eric