Re: add DIAGNOSTIC back to GENERIC/INSTALL

To: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: add DIAGNOSTIC back to GENERIC/INSTALL
From: David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 02:06:34 +0000

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 07:49:43PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
 > > I'm not in favor of LOCKDEBUG by default, for reasons already stated here.
 > 
 > Also, could LOCKDEBUG have ABI issues with modules ?
 > I've only ever used LOCKDEBUG with non-MODULAR kernels ...

The whole reason LOCKDEBUG is abysmally slow is that it does crazy
things to preserve the same ABI. Personally I think this is a poor
tradeoff...

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost

Follow-Ups:
- Re: add DIAGNOSTIC back to GENERIC/INSTALL
  - From: Manuel Bouyer

References:
- add DIAGNOSTIC back to GENERIC/INSTALL
  - From: Manuel Bouyer
- Re: add DIAGNOSTIC back to GENERIC/INSTALL
  - From: Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
- Re: add DIAGNOSTIC back to GENERIC/INSTALL
  - From: Manuel Bouyer
- Re: add DIAGNOSTIC back to GENERIC/INSTALL
  - From: Manuel Bouyer

Prev by Date: Re: add DIAGNOSTIC back to GENERIC/INSTALL
Next by Date: Nfs tstiles
Previous by Thread: Re: add DIAGNOSTIC back to GENERIC/INSTALL
Next by Thread: Re: add DIAGNOSTIC back to GENERIC/INSTALL
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index