[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: extended attributes
On 6/9/11 9:37 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 08:07:02AM +0000, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
[autocreate extended attribute backend]
Such a behavior could be triggered by a new kernel option such
as UFS_EXTATTR_AUTOCREATE. It could hold the default size for autocreated
attributes. (e.g.: options UFS_EXTATTR_AUTOCREATE=1024 to get 1024 bytes
Here is a patch that implements this option. Is it reasonable to commit it?
I can't comment on the content of the patch itself, but I am definitely
in favor of moving toward default support for extended attributes, and
this _seems_ like a good start. Thank you for working on this.
Main Index |
Thread Index |