Re: sleeping instead of ENOBUFS on write to socket?

[Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 01:05:07AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > A major goal of perfuse was to avoid heavy modification of FUSE filesystems.
> > I would like to leave the way they write unmodified if this is possible.
> Have you considered renaming write(2) and provide a fixed stub that way?

I did but I would prefer to avoid that, since there can be many write() 
calls in the sources.

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
manu%netbsd.org@localhost