tech-kern archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
raidframe problem after upgrade
Hello,
after upgrading a server from 5.0_STABLE to 5.1_STABLE, I've seen
(after a clean reboot):
raid8: RAID Level 1
raid8: Components: component0[**FAILED**] /dev/sd40e
raid8: Total Sectors: 9644113792 (4709039 MB)
raid8: WARNING: raid8: total sector size in disklabel (1054179200) != the size
of raid (9644113792)
raid15: RAID Level 1
raid15: Components: /dev/sd80e component1[**FAILED**]
raid15: Total Sectors: 1054179200 (514735 MB)
sd40e and sd80e are both part of raid8, raid15 should not be there. Also, the
size of the raid is wrong: it should be 514735MB and not 4709039MB
(500GB, not 4TB).
After destroying raid15 and wipping out the first 64MB of /dev/sd80e,
when trying to add it as a hot spare, I get:
Spare disk /dev/sd80e (512 blocks) is too small to serve as a spare (need
9644113792 blocks)
Any idea how to fix this ? is it related to 32 vs 64bits issues that did
show up some time ago ?
here is the disklabel of sd80 and sd40 (both are identical):
bytes/sector: 512
sectors/track: 128
tracks/cylinder: 128
sectors/cylinder: 16384
cylinders: 25000
total sectors: 1464483840
rpm: 3600
interleave: 1
trackskew: 0
cylinderskew: 0
headswitch: 0 # microseconds
track-to-track seek: 0 # microseconds
drivedata: 0
5 partitions:
# size offset fstype [fsize bsize cpg/sgs]
a: 409600000 0 RAID # (Cyl. 0 - 24999)
d: 1464483840 0 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 - 89384)
e: 1054883840 409600000 RAID # (Cyl. 25000 - 89384)
--
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index